+88.1%
LNG vs EPAM
-54.6%
+142.7%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -2.4% | +2.8% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +3.4% | +2.0% | +1.5% | +3.3% |
| 30D | +14.9% | +6.5% | +8.3% | +14.3% |
| 3M | +21.4% | +19.9% | +1.5% | +19.4% |
| 6M | +17.8% | -16.9% | +34.7% | +18.8% |
| YTD | +51.3% | -42.9% | +94.2% | +56.0% |
| 1Y | +24.4% | -30.4% | +54.8% | +25.9% |
| All | +88.1% | -54.6% | +142.7% | +89.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling