+77.1%
LNG vs ENTG
+42.3%
+34.7%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -3.9% | +4.6% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -4.5% | +5.1% | -9.6% | -4.5% |
| 30D | +4.7% | -8.5% | +13.2% | +4.7% |
| 3M | +15.1% | +6.7% | +8.4% | +14.0% |
| 6M | +13.6% | +17.7% | -4.2% | +11.3% |
| YTD | +44.0% | +63.5% | -19.5% | +37.0% |
| 1Y | +18.4% | +73.6% | -55.2% | +11.4% |
| All | +77.1% | +42.3% | +34.7% | +70.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling