+77.1%
LNG vs EAT
+585.9%
-508.8%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -0.3% | +1.0% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -4.5% | -6.2% | +1.7% | -4.1% |
| 30D | +4.7% | -3.0% | +7.7% | +4.8% |
| 3M | +15.1% | +45.6% | -30.5% | +12.3% |
| 6M | +13.6% | +53.5% | -40.0% | +9.8% |
| YTD | +44.0% | +49.6% | -5.6% | +39.1% |
| 1Y | +18.4% | +38.9% | -20.5% | +14.9% |
| All | +77.1% | +585.9% | -508.8% | +70.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling