+75.9%
LNG vs ARWR
+173.2%
-97.3%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARWR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -2.9% | +2.9% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -6.7% | -3.2% | -3.5% | -6.7% |
| 30D | +3.9% | -6.5% | +10.3% | +4.0% |
| 3M | +15.5% | +12.7% | +2.8% | +15.2% |
| 6M | +10.5% | +36.2% | -25.7% | +9.7% |
| YTD | +43.0% | +24.5% | +18.5% | +42.1% |
| 1Y | +18.9% | +198.0% | -179.1% | +13.5% |
| All | +75.9% | +173.2% | -97.3% | +64.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARWR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARWR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARWR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARWR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling