+75.9%
LNG vs ARES
+38.2%
+37.7%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARES | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -3.1% | +3.0% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -6.7% | -2.7% | -4.1% | -6.4% |
| 30D | +3.9% | -2.4% | +6.2% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +15.5% | +3.9% | +11.6% | +14.4% |
| 6M | +10.5% | +26.4% | -15.9% | +4.8% |
| YTD | +43.0% | -14.9% | +57.8% | +47.7% |
| 1Y | +18.9% | -20.4% | +39.3% | +24.5% |
| All | +75.9% | +38.2% | +37.7% | +62.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARES.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARES return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARES return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARES wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling