+86.2%
LNG vs AMDL
+95.0%
-8.9%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AMDL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +9.2% | -8.8% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +3.4% | +4.5% | -1.1% | +3.3% |
| 30D | +14.9% | -4.4% | +19.3% | +14.9% |
| 3M | +21.4% | -30.5% | +51.9% | +21.5% |
| 6M | +17.8% | +300.9% | -283.1% | +10.2% |
| YTD | +51.3% | +219.9% | -168.6% | +41.7% |
| 1Y | +24.4% | +374.7% | -350.3% | +12.1% |
| All | +86.2% | +95.0% | -8.9% | +62.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMDL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMDL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMDL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMDL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling