+67.3%
LNG vs AMC
-71.5%
+138.8%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +1.9% | -2.5% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -15.9% | +2.6% | -18.5% | -15.8% |
| 30D | +2.1% | +9.0% | -6.9% | +2.1% |
| 3M | +4.8% | +22.2% | -17.4% | +4.8% |
| 6M | +6.8% | +91.5% | -84.7% | +6.4% |
| YTD | +44.0% | +101.3% | -57.3% | +43.3% |
| 1Y | +34.9% | +20.8% | +14.2% | +35.4% |
| 3Y | +67.3% | -71.3% | +138.6% | +61.6% |
| All | +67.3% | -71.5% | +138.8% | +61.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling