+74.7%
LNG vs AMC
-67.8%
+142.5%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.5% | -3.4% | -2.1% | -5.5% |
| 7D | -6.2% | -0.8% | -5.4% | -6.2% |
| 30D | +8.0% | -1.2% | +9.2% | +8.0% |
| 3M | +16.9% | +42.2% | -25.3% | +16.5% |
| 6M | +8.7% | +118.8% | -110.1% | +7.8% |
| YTD | +43.0% | +64.1% | -21.1% | +42.3% |
| 1Y | +19.4% | -9.5% | +29.0% | +19.9% |
| 3Y | +74.7% | -64.3% | +139.1% | +75.0% |
| All | +74.7% | -67.8% | +142.5% | +75.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling