+46.8%
LMT vs STZ
-34.9%
+81.7%
-31.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.5% | 0.0% | +2.5% | +2.5% |
| 7D | -5.6% | +5.3% | -11.0% | -6.0% |
| 30D | +18.4% | +19.6% | -1.2% | +16.5% |
| 3M | +0.6% | +10.0% | -9.3% | -0.3% |
| 6M | +20.6% | -0.3% | +20.9% | +20.4% |
| YTD | +27.0% | +8.6% | +18.4% | +24.8% |
| 1Y | +36.9% | +16.6% | +20.3% | +33.5% |
| All | +46.8% | -34.9% | +81.7% | +51.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling