+16.1%
LMT vs OWL
+4.6%
+11.5%
-17.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | OWL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | 0.0% | -1.3% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +5.1% | +1.5% | +3.6% | +4.9% |
| 30D | +14.1% | +13.4% | +0.7% | +12.6% |
| 3M | +0.3% | -21.2% | +21.5% | +2.6% |
| 6M | +16.1% | +4.0% | +12.1% | +12.6% |
| All | +16.1% | +4.6% | +11.5% | +12.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside OWL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus OWL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × OWL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded OWL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling