-19.9%
LMT vs LSCC
+22.3%
-42.3%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +2.0% | -3.4% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -6.3% | +1.3% | -7.6% | -6.2% |
| 30D | -8.5% | -9.7% | +1.2% | -8.8% |
| 3M | +1.8% | -23.7% | +25.5% | +0.5% |
| 6M | -19.9% | +26.5% | -46.4% | -22.3% |
| All | -19.9% | +22.3% | -42.3% | -22.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling