+36.2%
LMT vs LDOS
+32.3%
+3.9%
-31.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -2.3% | +0.7% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -11.0% | -7.2% | -3.8% | -9.0% |
| 30D | +13.6% | +16.8% | -3.3% | +8.5% |
| 3M | -2.1% | -1.6% | -0.5% | -1.9% |
| 6M | +11.7% | -1.0% | +12.7% | +10.9% |
| YTD | +19.4% | -25.8% | +45.1% | +27.1% |
| 1Y | +24.1% | -31.1% | +55.1% | +34.7% |
| 3Y | +36.2% | +32.8% | +3.4% | +22.2% |
| All | +36.2% | +32.3% | +3.9% | +22.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling