+14.7%
LMT vs GLDM
-10.5%
+25.1%
-17.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | +0.8% | -4.0% | -3.0% |
| 7D | -10.5% | +1.9% | -12.4% | -9.9% |
| 30D | +12.9% | -1.7% | +14.6% | +13.2% |
| 3M | +0.4% | -3.5% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
| 6M | +14.7% | -10.1% | +24.7% | +15.0% |
| All | +14.7% | -10.5% | +25.1% | +15.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling