-17.6%
LMT vs CHTR
-36.8%
+19.2%
-24.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | CHTR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +5.0% | -3.9% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -7.1% | +6.6% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -10.8% | -10.9% | +0.1% | -10.5% |
| 3M | +1.6% | +2.0% | -0.4% | +1.3% |
| 6M | -17.6% | -35.9% | +18.4% | -14.5% |
| All | -17.6% | -36.8% | +19.2% | -14.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CHTR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CHTR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CHTR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CHTR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling