-17.6%
LMT vs BLK
+11.3%
-28.8%
-24.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | BLK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -0.9% | +2.0% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -5.2% | +4.6% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -10.8% | -7.0% | -3.7% | -10.1% |
| 3M | +1.6% | +5.7% | -4.1% | +0.9% |
| 6M | -17.6% | +11.0% | -28.6% | -18.2% |
| All | -17.6% | +11.3% | -28.8% | -18.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling