+27.8%
LMT vs ABCL
+104.5%
-76.7%
-31.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -1.2% | -0.2% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -6.3% | +0.7% | -7.0% | -6.3% |
| 30D | -8.5% | +93.1% | -101.6% | -9.5% |
| 3M | +1.8% | +79.4% | -77.6% | +0.8% |
| 6M | -19.9% | +214.9% | -234.8% | -21.5% |
| YTD | +10.6% | +234.2% | -223.6% | +8.2% |
| 1Y | +17.9% | +174.8% | -156.8% | +15.9% |
| All | +27.8% | +104.5% | -76.7% | +26.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling