+42.2%
LLY vs UMAC
+8.8%
+33.4%
-23.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -4.6% | +5.9% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +6.7% | -5.2% | +11.9% | +6.7% |
| 30D | +19.6% | -36.4% | +55.9% | +19.0% |
| 3M | +19.7% | -58.6% | +78.3% | +18.9% |
| 6M | +42.7% | -24.6% | +67.4% | +42.9% |
| YTD | +35.1% | -11.5% | +46.6% | +36.5% |
| 1Y | +42.2% | +16.9% | +25.3% | +45.4% |
| All | +42.2% | +8.8% | +33.4% | +45.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling