+1,677.1%
LITE vs UMAC
+494.0%
+1,183.1%
-50.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | -3.1% | +7.1% | +4.3% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -0.9% | -0.6% | -1.5% |
| 30D | +6.7% | -7.7% | +14.3% | +6.9% |
| 3M | -6.8% | -26.4% | +19.7% | -5.6% |
| 6M | +29.4% | +61.9% | -32.4% | +21.7% |
| YTD | +139.1% | +86.5% | +52.6% | +120.3% |
| 1Y | +521.0% | +156.3% | +364.7% | +457.3% |
| All | +1,677.1% | +494.0% | +1,183.1% | +1,362.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling