+1,563.7%
LITE vs LPLA
+54.7%
+1,509.0%
-50.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | -0.3% | +4.3% | +4.1% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -3.1% | +1.5% | -0.3% |
| 30D | +6.7% | -0.1% | +6.7% | +6.5% |
| 3M | -6.8% | +23.2% | -30.0% | -15.4% |
| 6M | +29.4% | +15.5% | +13.9% | +18.9% |
| YTD | +139.1% | +0.9% | +138.2% | +132.6% |
| 1Y | +521.0% | +0.2% | +520.8% | +504.7% |
| All | +1,563.7% | +54.7% | +1,509.0% | +1,289.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling