+1,563.7%
LITE vs GTLB
+0.5%
+1,563.2%
-50.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | +1.1% | +2.9% | +3.8% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +11.1% | -12.6% | -3.6% |
| 30D | +6.7% | +37.8% | -31.1% | -0.8% |
| 3M | -6.8% | +61.6% | -68.3% | -16.7% |
| 6M | +29.4% | +98.9% | -69.5% | +7.6% |
| YTD | +139.1% | +32.8% | +106.3% | +121.9% |
| 1Y | +521.0% | +14.7% | +506.3% | +501.7% |
| All | +1,563.7% | +0.5% | +1,563.2% | +1,467.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling