+553.9%
LITE vs GLXY
-44.8%
+598.6%
-55.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -18.7% | -7.1% | -11.6% | -16.4% |
| 7D | -44.6% | -28.4% | -16.2% | -38.4% |
| 30D | -55.0% | -41.4% | -13.6% | -47.2% |
| 3M | -38.3% | -31.9% | -6.4% | -30.4% |
| 6M | -48.8% | -57.2% | +8.4% | -37.0% |
| YTD | +38.3% | -41.9% | +80.2% | +54.7% |
| 1Y | +119.0% | -58.7% | +177.7% | +160.9% |
| All | +553.9% | -44.8% | +598.6% | +654.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling