+1,103.8%
LITE vs GLD
+103.9%
+999.9%
-55.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -18.7% | +0.8% | -19.5% | -19.0% |
| 7D | -44.6% | +1.9% | -46.4% | -45.0% |
| 30D | -55.0% | -1.8% | -53.3% | -54.7% |
| 3M | -38.3% | -3.6% | -34.7% | -37.3% |
| 6M | -48.8% | -10.2% | -38.5% | -46.9% |
| YTD | +38.3% | -5.3% | +43.5% | +39.6% |
| 1Y | +119.0% | +2.5% | +116.5% | +117.1% |
| All | +1,103.8% | +103.9% | +999.9% | +742.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling