+1,172.1%
LITE vs FERG
+56.2%
+1,115.9%
-55.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FERG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | -0.8% | +6.5% | +6.2% |
| 7D | -35.9% | -2.1% | -33.8% | -35.0% |
| 30D | -51.5% | +8.7% | -60.2% | -53.8% |
| 3M | -35.7% | -7.4% | -28.3% | -33.1% |
| 6M | -43.0% | -6.6% | -36.3% | -41.0% |
| YTD | +46.1% | +6.6% | +39.5% | +37.7% |
| 1Y | +124.7% | -3.6% | +128.3% | +125.7% |
| 3Y | +1,172.1% | +56.4% | +1,115.7% | +839.1% |
| All | +1,172.1% | +56.2% | +1,115.9% | +839.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FERG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FERG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FERG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FERG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling