+1,563.7%
LITE vs CSGP
-61.9%
+1,625.6%
-50.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CSGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | -2.4% | +6.4% | +4.1% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -4.1% | +2.5% | -1.4% |
| 30D | +6.7% | +2.3% | +4.3% | +6.1% |
| 3M | -6.8% | -8.2% | +1.4% | -5.4% |
| 6M | +29.4% | -35.1% | +64.5% | +43.5% |
| YTD | +139.1% | -54.0% | +193.1% | +197.4% |
| 1Y | +521.0% | -65.3% | +586.3% | +792.6% |
| All | +1,563.7% | -61.9% | +1,625.6% | +2,133.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CSGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CSGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CSGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CSGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling