+1,103.8%
LITE vs ARWR
+103.1%
+1,000.7%
-55.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARWR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -18.7% | -6.8% | -11.9% | -16.9% |
| 7D | -44.6% | -5.0% | -39.6% | -43.7% |
| 30D | -55.0% | -6.6% | -48.4% | -54.0% |
| 3M | -38.3% | -33.9% | -4.4% | -31.8% |
| 6M | -48.8% | -23.3% | -25.4% | -46.3% |
| YTD | +38.3% | -13.5% | +51.7% | +39.4% |
| 1Y | +119.0% | +42.5% | +76.4% | +90.9% |
| All | +1,103.8% | +103.1% | +1,000.7% | +745.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARWR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARWR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARWR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARWR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling