+1,563.7%
LITE vs AMC
-79.6%
+1,643.3%
-50.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | +4.3% | -0.3% | +3.7% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +2.3% | -3.9% | -1.7% |
| 30D | +6.7% | -0.7% | +7.4% | +6.7% |
| 3M | -6.8% | +35.2% | -42.0% | -10.4% |
| 6M | +29.4% | +124.6% | -95.1% | +17.6% |
| YTD | +139.1% | +69.9% | +69.2% | +122.5% |
| 1Y | +521.0% | -2.6% | +523.6% | +508.9% |
| All | +1,563.7% | -79.6% | +1,643.3% | +1,719.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling