-32.0%
LII vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+67.9%
-34.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | +4.0% | -6.5% | -2.5% |
| 7D | +0.5% | -4.1% | +4.6% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -11.2% | -22.7% | +11.5% | -11.1% |
| 3M | -28.8% | -62.5% | +33.7% | -29.0% |
| 6M | -26.9% | -99.5% | +72.5% | -19.1% |
| YTD | -22.2% | -99.7% | +77.5% | -9.8% |
| 1Y | -32.0% | -99.9% | +67.9% | -14.8% |
| All | -32.0% | -99.9% | +67.9% | -14.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling