-29.7%
LII vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+70.2%
-34.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -3.8% | +4.9% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -8.0% | +7.3% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -12.6% | -27.9% | +15.3% | -12.4% |
| 3M | -24.4% | -74.6% | +50.1% | -24.1% |
| 6M | -28.7% | -99.5% | +70.7% | -21.9% |
| YTD | -19.1% | -99.7% | +80.6% | -7.5% |
| 1Y | -29.7% | -99.9% | +70.2% | -14.5% |
| All | -29.7% | -99.9% | +70.2% | -14.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling