-32.0%
LHX vs ZM
+26.0%
-57.9%
-32.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -0.3% | -1.8% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -3.7% | +0.3% | -4.0% | -3.7% |
| 30D | -13.2% | -10.3% | -2.9% | -13.5% |
| 3M | -18.4% | -0.7% | -17.7% | -18.4% |
| 6M | -32.0% | +24.8% | -56.8% | -34.3% |
| All | -32.0% | +26.0% | -57.9% | -34.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling