+54.0%
LHX vs MTZ
+160.5%
-106.5%
-34.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +3.5% | -4.7% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -4.3% | +1.4% | -5.6% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -15.1% | -14.5% | -0.7% | -14.5% |
| 3M | -21.0% | -32.9% | +12.0% | -19.5% |
| 6M | -32.0% | -20.8% | -11.1% | -32.1% |
| YTD | -15.3% | +10.6% | -25.9% | -18.0% |
| 1Y | -11.1% | +27.1% | -38.1% | -14.8% |
| 3Y | +54.0% | +166.1% | -112.1% | +28.6% |
| All | +54.0% | +160.5% | -106.5% | +28.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling