-14.9%
LHX vs MSTZ
-55.4%
+40.5%
-17.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +8.2% | -8.5% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -25.4% | +22.9% | -2.0% |
| 30D | -10.4% | -60.9% | +50.5% | -7.9% |
| 3M | -14.9% | -54.2% | +39.2% | -11.9% |
| All | -14.9% | -55.4% | +40.5% | -11.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling