+57.5%
LHX vs LDOS
+39.7%
+17.8%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | +0.5% | -2.2% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -5.4% | +3.5% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -9.9% | +4.9% | -14.8% | -11.6% |
| 3M | -16.5% | +7.2% | -23.7% | -19.1% |
| 6M | -29.6% | -24.2% | -5.3% | -23.0% |
| YTD | -11.6% | -25.8% | +14.2% | -3.3% |
| 1Y | -4.1% | -24.7% | +20.6% | +4.3% |
| All | +57.5% | +39.7% | +17.8% | +13.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling