-32.0%
LHX vs GFS
+0.4%
-32.3%
-32.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | +1.9% | -4.0% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -3.7% | +4.5% | -8.2% | -3.4% |
| 30D | -13.2% | -8.2% | -5.0% | -13.6% |
| 3M | -18.4% | -38.9% | +20.5% | -21.1% |
| 6M | -32.0% | -2.9% | -29.1% | -37.6% |
| All | -32.0% | +0.4% | -32.3% | -37.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling