+55.8%
LHX vs EMB
+29.4%
+26.4%
-33.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EMB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -0.8% | 0.0% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -4.8% | -1.1% | -3.7% | -4.1% |
| 30D | -12.7% | -1.1% | -11.7% | -12.1% |
| 3M | -17.6% | -0.8% | -16.9% | -17.2% |
| 6M | -30.7% | -0.1% | -30.7% | -30.8% |
| YTD | -14.3% | +0.4% | -14.8% | -14.7% |
| 1Y | -8.4% | +3.3% | -11.7% | -10.6% |
| All | +55.8% | +29.4% | +26.4% | +36.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EMB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EMB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EMB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EMB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling