+54.0%
LHX vs AIG
+33.9%
+20.1%
-34.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AIG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +0.4% | -1.5% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -4.3% | -1.2% | -3.1% | -4.0% |
| 30D | -15.1% | -1.1% | -14.1% | -15.0% |
| 3M | -21.0% | +0.7% | -21.6% | -21.1% |
| 6M | -32.0% | -2.2% | -29.8% | -31.7% |
| YTD | -15.3% | -10.8% | -4.5% | -13.2% |
| 1Y | -11.1% | -2.0% | -9.0% | -11.2% |
| 3Y | +54.0% | +34.8% | +19.2% | +37.7% |
| All | +54.0% | +33.9% | +20.1% | +37.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AIG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AIG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AIG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AIG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling