+57.1%
LHX vs ACM
-22.3%
+79.4%
-33.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -3.1% | +1.0% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -3.7% | -3.7% | 0.0% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -13.2% | -12.7% | -0.5% | -10.6% |
| 3M | -18.4% | -9.8% | -8.6% | -16.7% |
| 6M | -32.0% | -31.4% | -0.6% | -25.7% |
| YTD | -13.6% | -32.1% | +18.4% | -5.9% |
| 1Y | -6.0% | -47.8% | +41.8% | +9.9% |
| All | +57.1% | -22.3% | +79.4% | +59.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling