-7.7%
LHX vs ABCL
+118.2%
-125.9%
-25.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -4.1% | +4.3% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +6.5% | -2.7% | +9.2% | +6.5% |
| 30D | +16.1% | -5.4% | +21.5% | +16.0% |
| 3M | -2.8% | +22.4% | -25.3% | -3.4% |
| 6M | -7.7% | +127.6% | -135.3% | -8.9% |
| All | -7.7% | +118.2% | -125.9% | -8.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling