+87.9%
LH vs PFGC
+82.7%
+5.3%
-17.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +0.2% | +0.2% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +1.2% | +1.5% | -0.3% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +18.0% | +17.4% | +0.6% | +13.6% |
| 3M | +15.7% | -2.4% | +18.1% | +16.0% |
| 6M | +46.6% | +18.2% | +28.4% | +40.6% |
| YTD | +49.5% | +23.7% | +25.8% | +40.7% |
| 1Y | +40.2% | +15.0% | +25.2% | +34.7% |
| All | +87.9% | +82.7% | +5.3% | +63.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling