+64.7%
LH vs IAG
+817.0%
-752.3%
-17.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IAG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +2.1% | -3.3% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -3.2% | +1.7% | -4.9% | -3.3% |
| 30D | +0.1% | +11.4% | -11.3% | -0.4% |
| 3M | +18.6% | +33.0% | -14.4% | +16.9% |
| 6M | +17.9% | -6.0% | +23.9% | +18.0% |
| YTD | +28.9% | +24.6% | +4.4% | +27.1% |
| 1Y | +16.6% | +105.0% | -88.4% | +12.1% |
| All | +64.7% | +817.0% | -752.3% | +40.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IAG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IAG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IAG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IAG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling