+65.6%
LH vs GGLL
+245.5%
-180.0%
-17.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GGLL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -2.3% | +0.9% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -4.8% | +2.3% | -2.3% |
| 30D | +4.3% | -13.7% | +18.0% | +4.9% |
| 3M | +25.5% | -21.9% | +47.4% | +26.5% |
| 6M | +17.0% | +11.7% | +5.3% | +15.2% |
| YTD | +31.3% | +2.3% | +29.0% | +29.6% |
| 1Y | +20.0% | +76.2% | -56.2% | +14.2% |
| All | +65.6% | +245.5% | -180.0% | +48.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GGLL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GGLL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GGLL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GGLL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling