+59.4%
LH vs EPAM
-75.7%
+135.1%
-34.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -0.4% | -0.1% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +2.4% | -1.3% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +16.7% | +42.3% | -25.6% | +12.1% |
| 3M | +15.1% | +60.7% | -45.6% | +8.9% |
| 6M | +46.3% | +80.5% | -34.2% | +35.9% |
| YTD | +48.8% | -20.4% | +69.1% | +50.0% |
| 1Y | +39.7% | -9.6% | +49.3% | +38.8% |
| 3Y | +87.0% | -30.5% | +117.5% | +86.9% |
| All | +59.4% | -75.7% | +135.1% | +69.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling