+64.7%
LH vs BIIB
-19.0%
+83.7%
-17.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.8% | -0.3% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -3.2% | -5.4% | +2.2% | -2.0% |
| 30D | +0.1% | +1.7% | -1.6% | -0.3% |
| 3M | +18.6% | +5.8% | +12.8% | +16.7% |
| 6M | +17.9% | +11.9% | +6.0% | +14.2% |
| YTD | +28.9% | +19.7% | +9.2% | +22.2% |
| 1Y | +16.6% | +46.7% | -30.1% | +4.0% |
| All | +64.7% | -19.0% | +83.7% | +66.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling