+64.9%
LH vs ARMK
+120.0%
-55.1%
-17.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -0.9% | -0.5% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -2.4% | 0.0% | -1.9% |
| 30D | +4.3% | 0.0% | +4.3% | +4.2% |
| 3M | +25.5% | +6.7% | +18.9% | +23.4% |
| 6M | +17.0% | +38.8% | -21.9% | +7.5% |
| YTD | +31.3% | +55.2% | -23.9% | +17.7% |
| 1Y | +20.0% | +46.6% | -26.6% | +8.8% |
| All | +64.9% | +120.0% | -55.1% | +36.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling