+81.2%
LH vs ALHC
+21.9%
+59.2%
-17.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -2.9% | +3.8% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +1.0% | +0.5% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +17.5% | -14.2% | +31.7% | +18.0% |
| 3M | +16.1% | -45.1% | +61.2% | +17.9% |
| 6M | +43.4% | -59.5% | +102.9% | +46.5% |
| YTD | +47.2% | -62.8% | +110.0% | +50.5% |
| 1Y | +50.1% | -55.5% | +105.6% | +52.7% |
| 3Y | +81.2% | +25.7% | +55.5% | +77.3% |
| All | +81.2% | +21.9% | +59.2% | +77.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling