+64.9%
LH vs ABCL
+109.3%
-44.4%
-17.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -1.2% | -0.2% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -2.5% | +0.7% | -3.2% | -2.5% |
| 30D | +4.3% | +93.1% | -88.7% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +25.5% | +79.4% | -53.9% | +21.2% |
| 6M | +17.0% | +214.9% | -197.9% | +9.0% |
| YTD | +31.3% | +234.2% | -202.9% | +21.4% |
| 1Y | +20.0% | +174.8% | -154.8% | +11.5% |
| All | +64.9% | +109.3% | -44.4% | +48.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling