-79.5%
LGO vs VT
+75.0%
-154.5%
-83.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -2.7% | +0.4% | -3.2% | -3.6% |
| 30D | +1.4% | +1.0% | +0.5% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -23.7% | +2.4% | -26.0% | -26.3% |
| 6M | -58.7% | +12.0% | -70.7% | -66.3% |
| YTD | -24.5% | +15.3% | -39.8% | -40.4% |
| 1Y | -52.3% | +22.6% | -74.9% | -66.2% |
| All | -79.5% | +75.0% | -154.5% | -92.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling