-100.0%
LGHL vs VOO
+165.9%
-265.9%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -0.5% | +2.3% | +2.2% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -0.4% | -0.9% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -52.4% | -1.4% | -51.0% | -51.7% |
| 3M | -93.7% | +3.7% | -97.5% | -93.9% |
| 6M | -96.3% | +13.0% | -109.3% | -96.6% |
| YTD | -98.2% | +12.4% | -110.7% | -98.4% |
| 1Y | -99.8% | +18.6% | -118.4% | -99.8% |
| 3Y | -100.0% | +78.1% | -178.1% | -100.0% |
| 5Y | -100.0% | +82.3% | -182.3% | -100.0% |
| All | -100.0% | +165.9% | -265.9% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling