-100.0%
LGHL vs SPY
+75.5%
-175.5%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SPY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | -0.6% | -4.3% | -4.5% |
| 7D | -11.1% | -2.0% | -9.2% | -9.9% |
| 30D | -50.2% | -1.7% | -48.5% | -49.5% |
| 3M | -93.8% | +4.7% | -98.5% | -94.0% |
| 6M | -96.5% | +12.5% | -109.0% | -96.7% |
| YTD | -98.3% | +11.7% | -110.0% | -98.4% |
| 1Y | -99.8% | +17.5% | -117.3% | -99.8% |
| All | -100.0% | +75.5% | -175.5% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SPY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SPY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SPY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SPY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling