-100.0%
LGCL vs VOO
+54.9%
-154.9%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | -0.6% | -2.9% | -3.0% |
| 7D | -16.6% | +0.5% | -17.1% | -17.0% |
| 30D | -97.6% | -0.9% | -96.7% | -97.5% |
| 3M | -98.5% | +3.9% | -102.4% | -98.5% |
| 6M | -98.3% | +14.5% | -112.8% | -98.4% |
| YTD | -98.7% | +13.0% | -111.6% | -98.8% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | +19.4% | -119.3% | -99.9% |
| All | -100.0% | +54.9% | -154.9% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling