-9.6%
LDOS vs PLTU
+90.0%
-99.6%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -19.6% | +19.7% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -3.7% | -39.1% | +35.4% | -0.8% |
| 30D | +16.4% | -37.6% | +54.0% | +19.5% |
| 3M | +7.4% | -12.7% | +20.1% | +7.4% |
| 6M | -0.3% | +1.7% | -2.1% | -3.0% |
| YTD | -24.0% | -48.8% | +24.7% | -24.4% |
| 1Y | -29.6% | -56.2% | +26.6% | -29.7% |
| All | -9.6% | +90.0% | -99.6% | -16.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling