+35.9%
LDOS vs MTB
+97.1%
-61.1%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -2.2% | +2.3% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -3.7% | -1.9% | -1.8% | -3.2% |
| 30D | +16.4% | +0.5% | +15.9% | +16.3% |
| 3M | +7.4% | -12.2% | +19.6% | +10.7% |
| 6M | -0.3% | +3.4% | -3.7% | -1.2% |
| YTD | -24.0% | +11.3% | -35.3% | -26.0% |
| 1Y | -29.6% | +23.3% | -52.9% | -32.9% |
| All | +35.9% | +97.1% | -61.1% | +20.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling