+41.3%
LDOS vs MTB
+109.6%
-68.4%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -0.1% | +0.6% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -5.4% | +1.7% | -7.1% | -5.8% |
| 30D | +4.9% | -4.2% | +9.1% | +5.9% |
| 3M | +7.2% | +8.9% | -1.7% | +5.0% |
| 6M | -24.2% | +10.9% | -35.1% | -26.2% |
| YTD | -25.8% | +21.5% | -47.3% | -29.2% |
| 1Y | -24.7% | +21.9% | -46.6% | -28.3% |
| All | +41.3% | +109.6% | -68.4% | +19.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling